Trade Secret Detail

Trade Secret

National Bank of Kenya Limited v Leonard Gethoi Kamweti (Civil Appeal 257 of 2018) [2019] KECA 263 (KLR) (25 October 2019)

Parties
National Bank of Kenya Limited v Leonard Gethoi Kamweti
Court
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Bench
W. Karanja, F. Sichale, J. Mohammed, JJA
Tags
Breach of confidence Trade secrets
Date
2026-08-26

Facts

Kamweti, the bank's Company Secretary, was placed on early retirement in July 2013. The bank alleged he unlawfully recorded a Board meeting of 8 July 2013 and disclosed the recording and minutes to third parties, including the Central Bank of Kenya, the Capital Markets Authority and the Law Society of Kenya, via letters dated 2 and 9 August 2013, and sued for breach of confidence in the High Court. Kamweti argued the matter was actually an employment dispute belonging in the Employment and Labour Relations Court.

Issues

Whether the High Court or the Employment and Labour Relations Court had jurisdiction, that is, whether breach of confidence over board minutes is an employment matter or a distinct equitable tort, and the scope of s.87(3) of the Employment Act.

Rule

Constitution of Kenya 2010, Articles 162(2)(a) and 165(5); Employment Act s.87(1)-(3); Employment and Labour Relations Court Act s.12(1); the common law doctrine of breach of confidence, citing Saltman Engineering Co Ltd v Campbell Engineering Co Ltd [1948] 65 RPC 203 and Coco v A.N. Clark (Engineers) Ltd [1969] RPC 41.

Analysis

The Court of Appeal held jurisdiction is determined by the pleaded cause of action, not merely the underlying employment relationship. Breach of confidence is an independent equitable wrong, citing the classic Saltman/Coco confidentiality test, distinct from a contractual or labour dispute; the employment relationship here merely gave Kamweti access to the confidential board minutes but was not itself the subject of the suit.

Conclusion

Appeal allowed; the High Court's order transferring the suit to the Employment and Labour Relations Court was set aside — the High Court retained jurisdiction over the breach-of-confidence claim. Costs to the appellant bank.

Judgement available at kenyalaw.org.

Frequently Asked Questions

Frequently Asked Questions

The IP Case Law Database is a repository of case briefs summarising rulings and judgments related to intellectual property law in Kenya. It covers various types of IP, including copyrights, trademarks, patents, and more.

The database is open to legal practitioners, researchers, scholars, and students interested in the field of intellectual property law in Kenya. It is designed to be a useful tool for anyone seeking to understand the legal precedents that shape IP law in the country.

The database features cases across all areas of intellectual property law, including copyright infringement, trademark disputes, patent issues, and cases involving industrial designs and utility models. It also includes cases related to collective management organisations and royalty collection.

We aim to update the database regularly to ensure that it contains the latest rulings and judgments. New cases are added as soon as they are available to keep our users informed about the latest developments in IP law.

Yes, the database is fully searchable. You can search by case name, type of intellectual property, legal issue, or court decision. This allows you to quickly find relevant case briefs based on your research needs.

Each case brief includes key details such as the facts of the case, the legal issues at hand, the court’s ruling, and a summary of the legal analysis. This structure helps users quickly understand the critical points of each ruling.

In addition to the case briefs, we provide links to full-text judgments where available. This ensures that users can access the complete legal reasoning and details if they need more in-depth information.

To cite cases from our database, you should follow standard legal citation practices. Each case brief includes the official case reference, making it easy to include in your legal documents or research papers.

At this time, the database is curated by legal experts and researchers. However, we welcome suggestions for cases to include or features to improve the platform. Please contact us through our support page if you have feedback or suggestions.